Rarely have I felt more compelled to want more information about something than I did when I watched this YouTube video from the makers of XBOX.  I have a Playstation 3 at home as well as a Nintendo Wie.  After I watched this video I felt like my systems were mere toys compared to what is coming from XBOX.

What really  makes this work is the time the creators had the luxury to exploit.  This video is more than three minutes long.   Three minutes of TV time is hugely expensive…and then it’s gone.  This video however stays up on YouTube as long as the creators care to leave it there.  Enormous efficiency.

However; there is one hitch to this deal.  Quality.  What you post to YouTube must absolutely rock & roll.  Either the presentation or the actual news itself has to be so good that people actually share it far & wide.  If you forget the quality…you might as well forget YouTube.

Which leads me to an interesting question.  Is content quality the most important component of a social media strategy?  I’d love to know what you think.

About this whole brand idea.

It’s important; very important if you are a product manager, to have a crystal clear understanding of the basics. If you can’t explain branding, brands and brand management to someone in about 60-seconds, you are probably confused. And it wouldn’t be in the least bit surprising if you were; confused I mean. In the course of my 25 years in marketing, I’ve come across an interesting variety of ideas about brands, branding and brand management. And I have met many marketing professionals; some with their own ideas about brands and branding and surprisingly many who have never thought about it or who feel it’s not really all that important. And, this won’t surprise people in the medical marketing business; I’ve met many sales people and physicians who think medical professionals are above responding to branded marketing efforts. I’ve even met a VP Director of Marketing who believed fervently that “The internet has signaled the end of branding.” And have we ever made a simple thing complicated to learn. A quick google-search shows 40,500,000 web sites discussing branding in some way. Visit a local book store and check out the marketing shelves. I guarantee that you will see dozens of books on, you guessed it, branding. It’s so confusing it makes you want to crawl into bed and go fetal. But I promise, if you read the next few paragraphs and ask yourself a simple question; does this make sense?, you will have a clearer understanding than you’ve ever had before and you will feel more certainty about the things you do to persuade others to choose your brand. Let’s do it.

I like clarity.  So I’ll answer some basic questions simply, and clearly.

WHY EVEN BOTHER WITH BRANDING?

PEOPLE WANT EASY DECISIONS. IT’S IN THE DNA. The human decision-making process IMHO is largely based on branding. But not branding as most understand it. Branding as a core component of human nature. As a marketer, it’s important to understand human nature, because if you know how people make decisions you’ll learn how best to sell to them.  And you will really begin to understand how to build a great brand.

WHAT IS BRANDING?

tornadocolor2Branding is an autonomic human decision-making mechanism that has been elemental in mankind’s rise to species dominance. It’s one of the reasons we dominate this planet in spite being a physically inferior species. Think of it this way. Branding is a human mechanism that helps us make the best decisions, fastest, bettering our chance of surviving… longest. Because this is an autonomic process rooted in our DNA, we have no choice in whether we brand or not. We can no more stop branding than we could willingly stop breathing. We brand everything, all day, every day. Branding is the process of mentally sifting through the onslaught of everyday information and making decisions…about everything. You branded your husband. You brand your children and your friends and relatives. You brand streets and neighbourhoods. You brand countries and groups. We do this as a means of organizing our world so that we can make good decisions, fast. What does this DNA-based survival code look like in our modern world, where we no longer compete with other species for dominance? The modern equivalent of SURVIVAL is SUCCESS. We now use our innate ability to brand, to self-promote the modern version of survival – success. And we do it from the moment we gain consciousness. A baby knows it’s mother very quickly, and comes to know father, brother, sister etc. very quickly thereafter. KEY CONCLUSION: MAKE DECISIONS EASIER FOR YOUR CUSTOMERS, AND YOUR CUSTOMERS WILL LOVE YOU.

WHAT IS A BRAND? A brand is quite simply, an idea that has found a well lit parking spot in your brain.  Some examples: Your favorite coffee shop. The fastest route to work. Everest (world’s highest mountain).  Miss Universe (world’s most beautiful woman). Green (the environment). Red white and blue (USA). A man walks down the street wearing a hoodee jacket, dark sunglasses…most women instantly brand him “dangerous” and cross to the other side of the street or walk carefully past him. When you meet someone new, you are almost subconsciously, instantly evaluating everything.  Appearance, smell and sound create an immediate impression that effects your decision to want to know more or not.

WHAT IS PROFESSIONAL BRAND MANAGEMENT? The things a professional marketer does to make it easier for their customer to choosing their product or idea. My job as an ad agency professional is simple. I make decisions easier to make.

So next time a doctor says that marketing plays no role in their selection process, smile, nod politely and continue branding your product and ideas, because whether they believe or not, you are lighting up a parking space in their brain where your product or idea will sit, waiting, patiently, until the next time the good doctor needs to make a decision quickly.

IDEAS

This is a forum for ideas. And my first idea is to ask you for yours. If you have a question about marketing you’d like us to address, just ask it and we will respond to you, personally.

COMMENTS

Comments are welcome. Post your thoughts here, but remember kids, this is a public place so let’s keep it clean.

Thanks, and stay in closer touch with me at twitter:

www.twitter.com/lawrencebinding


There has been a great deal of speculation over the past few years about diminishing access to physicians and how this development might alter the role of the pharmaceutical sales representative in the near future.  Change is indeed imminent and the reasons are evident.  Are you ready?

Physician time is becoming even more scarce as North America’s millions of baby boomers enter their retirement years with the health issues common to advancing age.  Pharmaceutical companies are squeezing from from the other side and competing aggressively for those precious minutes with the doctor.  Complicating matters further is the recent advent of multiple sales reps from the same company arriving in a physicians’ office on the same day, sometimes even simultaneously. Put yourself in the doctor’s shoes.  You barely have time to see the patient’s crowding your waiting room, let alone spend the appropriate time diagnosing and dispensing, consoling, counseling, commiserating, and all the other ings a doctor deals with and to top it off, the Getbettertoday Pharmaceutical company foists not one, but two shiny, happy people on you.  Hardly a recipe for a successful call and I certainly don’t envy the unfortunate sales rep who shows up at 3:30 in the afternoon.

These circumstances have led to a decrease in doctor availability in the short term and point to bigger changes in the long-term.  We may be facing a number of new realities in the near-future including:

More Closed doors: No-see docs.

Pay-for-access: A fee charged for sales rep time in the doctor’s office.

Government-regulated access: Legislation determines how much time a phsyician can spend with industry sales reps.

Medical Governing Body Access Rules: AMA or another body creates a code governing industry access to physicians.

And there you have it; a medical environment that simply will not continue to be the selling environment we’ve enjoyed since the 1930s.

The leaders in this new marketplace will be the companies that see the new opportunities and that have the courage to be first with new ideas that exploit the new conditions. An example of a big idea that might help a company into a leadership position would be to become the company famous for dispensing the one thing physicians do not have time to acquire for themselves:  PRECIOUS INFORMATION. Transform your selling force into your information force.

What if your sales rep were perceived as a literal fountain of knowledge by the medical community?  If I were a doctor and I had one or two reps that always got me information I valued, even if it was competitor information, that sales rep would always be welcome in my schedule.

I think that super-rep of tomorrow exists today, just not in a branded way.  No company owns that territory…yet.  Might yours be first?  Call us.  We can help.  Because while doing it is the first thing, quickly branding the idea and becoming famous for it should be part of the plan, and Commotion can help.

I recently read an interesting article about social media and the difficulties associated with planning them into marketing plans.  The gist of the article is that until precise demographic data is available, social media will be an afterthought for most marketing planners.

MY THOUGHTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA (Like Facebook, Youtube, FLICKR, Myspace, Twitter etc.)

There may be a lack of demographic data on many social networking sites, but I feel strongly that this should not stop savvy marketers from using these sites to reach people.  I think that the lack of data represents a negotiating opportunity that could be nicely balanced against the risk associated with paying for presence in an environment with imprecise reach numbers.

Imagine if Ford, GM P&G & Lever decided in the early years of TV not to advertise because the demographics were not precise.  Makes me wonder how strong those brands would be today.

Out of curiosity I wonder if US President Barack Obama worried about the lack of demographics prior to deciding that he needed to create a dominating internet presence?  Can you imagine this conversation:

B.O. ” I want to be everywhere …not just on TV and in newspapers and magazines.  And everywhere includes the internet.”  I think we need a presence on Facebook, Myspace and YouTube as a starting point.”

Campaign advisor:  ”Barack.  I just don’t see the strategic reason for being there.  Facebook is for kids and Myspace is basically for musicians and actors.  We’ve already got that demo sewn up.  We’re weak against readers of the Washington Post and The NY Times.”

BO:   “I hear that.  But I want to connect and be able to respond faster than we can on TV and in print.  And I do get why we need to be on TV and in the newspapers.  So let’s do that.  But for once let’s beat the Republicans in the alleyway and own the internet too.  I think we need to show real change…not just talk it.  And by creating a Presidential internet campaign we can demonstrate that we are connected to what is happening and will continue to happen in the world.  WE ARE DOING THIS IN A BIG WAY…so let’s make it happen fast.”

Campaign advisor:  ”We’ll get on it right away.”

Barack Obama may be the best marketed President brand in history.  There’s a lesson in his success for us marketing people to absorb.

Here’s a thought for today.  If you believe, as I do, that the time people spend getting information and entertainment from internet sources is going to continue to rise, shouldn’t it be a fairly easy leap to make the internet a must-have in your marketing plan?

I say, be in the vanguard…or be on guard for brand decline.  Here is the ad age article.

Social Media Playtime Is Over

That Many Marketers Still ‘Experimenting’ Is Not a Good Sign

B.L. Ochman
B.L. Ochman

Fifty percent of corporations surveyed in Forrester Research’s “Social Media Playtime is Over” report are increasing social media spending in the face of the recession. But that’s far from the point of the recently released report.

Three-quarters of those surveyed who knew their budgets said they allowed for $100,000 or less for social media tools over a 12-month period, according to the report, written by Forrester analyst Jeremiah K. Owyang. And they are not integrating social media into their overall marketing strategy. Instead, they are “experimenting” with isolated tactics and hoping that they will take the place of long-term strategy.

Furthermore, Owyang notes, social media is more of an after-thought than a marketing line item. “45-percent of marketers say their social budgets are determined as needed and 23-percent say they scrape together funds from wherever they can find them.”

“Our data shows that marketers intend to invest more in social media but have yet to justify substantial budgets. If you continue to fund social applications only as experiments, you’re unlikely to be able to do enough to make an impact or to have a secure source of funding for the future. One way to put these efforts on a firmer footing is to concentrate on objectives and measure progress toward those objectives, rather than just experimenting to see what happens. … Without concentrating on measurable objectives, it will be difficult to justify further investment in the future.”"…As one of the few marketing budget items increasing during a recession, social media marketing needs to be taken seriously and treated as a corporate asset. To be successful, social media marketing must be managed as long-term programs, not short-term experiments. To succeed, make sure you have dedicated resources in place, including both social media strategists and community managers,” writes Owyang.

Unfortunately, many social media strategists are still confronting conversations like this one, recently reported to me by a fellow social media strategist:

CMO: We want you to get bloggers to write about our site and generate 250K monthly visits through their posts.

Agency: What is your demographic? What is your goal for that traffic?

CMO: We want them to spend money on the site, and we want to see how much traffic social media can generate.

Agency: What support will you give to your “experiment”? Does your budget include search engine optimization? PR? Google advertising? Company blog? Advertising on targeted blogs? A forum? An interactive website? Content sponsorship? Sponsored blog posts? Videos? Print advertising? Email campaign?

CMO: Those cost money. We don’t have budget available for any of those.

Agency: Who on your staff has this campaign as his/her full-time responsibility?

CMO: Nobody.

Agency: What other marketing tools can we employ? Can we create a blog? Facebook page? Flickr group? YouTube videos? Twitter? Can we participate in social networks including Friend Feed and other online communities?

CMO: Our legal department says we cannot allow people to write on the wall on our Facebook pages. We can’t participate in Twitter because everything we say has to pass through legal first and approval can take several days. So any site where we are expected to engage in public conversation would be out.

As the Forrester study indicates, until the corporate side of that conversation changes. not much else will. In other words, companies need to KISS.

Almost two thirds of all physicians in the USA now carry a smart-phone such as an iPHONE or Blackberry. This new statistic underscores the importance of including technology devices and the internet in pharma marketing plans.  The article below from World Pharma News

SMARTPHONES HELP DOCS LEARN, EDUCATE AND DIAGNOSE.  Next Step Rx?

Physicians “Get Smart” – Number of Docs Using Smartphones Surges to 64% in 2009

Wednesday, 15 April 2009
In 2009, the number of physicians using smartphones surged to 64%, according to Taking the Pulse® v9.0, pharmaceutical and healthcare market research company Manhattan Research’s newly released study focused on physician adoption, use, and impact of the Internet and other technologies. This group of “smart” physicians using mobile devices such as iPhones and BlackBerries increased by 20% between 2008 and 2009. In fact, the number of physicians using iPhones more than doubled in the past year alone.Survey results indicate that physicians’ increased reliance on smartphones is not cannibalizing Internet usage on computers. Rather, physicians are spending more time online overall and are using both computers and smartphones to access to the most up-to-date online medical and pharmaceutical resources at a variety of points throughout the day. Additionally, smartphone-using physicians are an important group to take note of for strategy planning, especially for brand teams looking to leverage the evolving physician media mix in building relationships with their target audiences.

“Physicians have always been advanced in terms of their mobile use”, said Monique Levy, Senior Director of Research at Manhattan Research, “Nevertheless, growth in smartphone ownership in the last year is remarkable. Mobile is delivering on its promise to allow doctors to be ‘always on’ – which is partly why so many doctors say the Internet is essential to their practice.”

H1N1 in Canada

21 Oct
2009

Jennifer McCann, Medical Writer

Jennifer McCann, Commotion Medical Writer

Recently, I had the opportunity to see Dr. Ross Davidson speak about the April 2009, H1N1 outbreak in Canada. Dr. Davidson, from Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, was on the frontlines during the beginning of the H1N1 outbreak in Canada as Nova Scotia was the first province to register a number of H1N1 cases. It was Dr. Davidson’s lab, along with others, who first identified the presence of the virus in Canada. Here is a summary of his talk in the hopes of clarifying some of the issues surrounding this virus.

What is the flu?

Influenza is an infectious disease, caused by RNA viruses that affect birds and mammals. There are three types of flu viruses (A, B and C). Type A viruses are responsible for human influenza pandemics, are most virulent in humans and cause the most severe disease. Influenza A can be further subdivided into serotypes e.g. H1N1, H3N2, H5N1 etc. Type B flu causes a milder disease and type C is rare and usually only causes mild disease in children.

People often confuse a cold for the flu. You likely have the flu if it comes on fast (less that 4 hours after exposure), you have a high fever, a dry cough, chills, headache or muscle pain throughout your body. In Canada, flu season usually occurs between November and April.

Typically, symptoms from the flu last approximately 3 days. Complications that could arise include bacterial pneumonia, earaches, sinus infections, dehydration and worsening of chronic medical conditions (e.g. congestive heart failure, asthma and diabetes). These types of complications are the source of the majority of hospitalizations and deaths from the flu. Those at high risk for the seasonal flu are the elderly and the very young. Additionally, pregnant women in their 2nd or 3rd trimester are classified as high risk.

How does the H1N1 pandemic differ from the seasonal flu?

A pandemic refers to a worldwide outbreak of an infectious disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a pandemic classification system that is used to declare the phases of flu pandemic in the event of an alert. In the span of about 3 weeks, the H1N1 flu went from a classification of phase 3 (an influenza virus causing sporadic cases or small clusters of disease in people) to a phase 6 (the pandemic phase: community level outbreaks in at least one other country in a different WHO region). According to Dr. Davidson, the H1N1 virus went from phase 3 to phase 6 in about 3 weeks. Furthermore, H1N1 is a novel strain; therefore there is no natural immunity to protect against the virus in the population. Interestingly, the death rate from them pandemic H1N1 flu is comparable to a moderate year of seasonal flu (approximately 0.4%) and the 1918 H1N1 Spanish flu. It is the sheer number of people that were infected that led to the notion that the mortality rate was higher than the seasonal flu. In contrast to the seasonal flu, the first outbreak of H1N1 occurred in April of 2009, with the second wave expected to hit in the fall.

According to Dr. Davidson, symptoms of H1N1 are similar to the seasonal flu but typically last 7 days. People with underlying health conditions are more vulnerable to the virus. However, with H1N1, more young and healthy people have shown to be susceptible than with the common seasonal flu. A recent report suggested that many of the Canadians who died or were sent to hospital earlier this year with H1N1 virus were young adults, female and aboriginal. These ages and mortality patterns were similar to that of the 1918 H1N1 Spanish flu pandemic.

What to do to protect yourself from infection.

Dr. Davidson stated three major ways to decrease the spread of H1N1 and to protect you from getting infected.

  1. Wash your hands. As obvious as it may seem, washing your hands with soap and warm water is the best way to prevent spread of the virus. Use a hand sanitizer if you cannot get to a sink to wash your hands;
  2. Cough and sneeze into your sleeve; and
  3. Get vaccinated against the H1N1 virus.

Dr.Davidson and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) do not recommend that members of the general public wear surgical masks to protect against contracting H1N1.

What to do once you have H1N1

There are some treatments available for H1N1. Tamiflu (oseltamivir) is an oral medication and Relenza (zanamivir) is an inhaled antiviral. However, PHAC does not recommend that antivirals be given for a mild disease or on a preventive basis at this time to decrease the chance of resistance development. Furthermore, if you have been diagnosed with H1N1 flu, it is recommended that you stay home from work, or keep your children home from school, to prevent the spread of the disease.

Back Home

The Blog is Only Partly Dead

The big news during the last several months is that the blogs are dead. Now it’s all about micro-blogging, and social networking. But is the blog really dead? Or is the death of blogs greatly exaggerated?

The thing about blogs, and most new internet advances, is that they goes through three stages.

  1. Discovery, where we discover this new found potential
  2. Buzz period, where it is blown out of proportions as people try to use it for everything
  3. Maturity, where the excess “fat” is removed, and all that is left is the stuff that really matters.

The blog is now at stage 3. We no longer need to discover what the blog can do. We all know what it is, and its value (or more importantly, how to make it valuable). And we have gone through the period where people try to use it for everything imaginable.

What’s left is what the blog is really about, and that is what we are seeing now. The blogs that are dying are those who try to use the platform for something it is not really good at. But the blog itself is far from dead. In fact, it is more valuable today than ever.

The types of blogs that have died are:

  • Personal diaries have moved on to Facebook, which is a much better platform for sharing what your life is about.
  • All types of microblogging, either being short status updates about what you are doing, or just the quick note you want to share, has move away as well. In this case to Twitter, which is a far better at allowing you to “post short comments”.
  • Photoblogs have moved to Flickr. &
  • Video blogs have moved on to several Podcasting channels, and dedicated video profiles like Vimeo, YouTube or Blip.tv
  • Linkblogs are now being replaced by personal bookmarking channels at either Stumbleupon or Delicious.
  • Event blogs have also moved on to Facebook
  • Fan blogs have also moved on to Facebook
  • Product showcases have partly moved on to many different platforms (depending on how it is done).
  • Debates and asking questions have moved to Twitter – where I, while writing this article asked “is the blog really dead”, and I got back some interesting feedback. (Thanks guys!)

The blog is dead when it comes to all of the above. It was never really good at it in the first place.

But the blog isn’t dead. Far from it.

What is left is a type of blogs that has always been really effective. It is the “way for independent journalists (both professional and amateur) to write valuable content.” Or when companies want to provide more personal and in-depth insight into what they are working on.

The blog is no longer a diary (that is what you do on Twitter), it is not the place to post links (that is what you do on Stumbleupon), and not the place to ‘be’ (that is what you do on Facebook).

How Companies should use blogs?

The company blog is actually a really good example of when and why you should use a blog. I have been advocating “company blogs” for several years, but it isn’t for everything.

  • If all you want to do is to ‘be around’ then you should create a Facebook Page.
  • If you just want to tell people when you launch new products, then you should get a Twitter account.
  • If you just want to showcase the latest pictures and videos you have taken, Use Flickr instead.
  • If all you want is to publish your press releases, then you should forget it (nobody read those anyway).
  • If you want to publish press images, use Flickr
    (good example: Dell’s official Flickr Page)
  • If all you want is to publish when other people have posted reviews, then you should do that on either Flickr or your Facebook Page. …Or, even better, create a Stumbleupon page, with links to all the sites.
  • If you want to do product support then you should turn to Twitter.
    (good example: HTC Twitter page)
  • If you want to get people to feel the “life” in your company, then – again – use Twitter + Flickr
  • If you want to connect to people, use Facebook, Linkedin etc.
  • If you want to do case studies, turn to video and do a video podcast instead (via iTunes, YouTube, Vimeo etc.)
  • If you want to make a fan page, turn to Facebook Pages
  • If you want to support a cause, create a Facebook Group
  • If you want to tell about your latest product, turn to one-pagers and post a link on your Twitter and Facebook accounts. And post the high-quality pictures on Flickr
  • If your CEO (or key employees) wants to ‘say a few words’ use Twitter.

All of these are best done using other platforms that blogs. But…

  • If you want to create a more in-depth look at what you are doing, use blogs.
    (Good example: Microsoft IE Blog)
  • If you want to give good advice about how to use your product, and how to get more out of it, use blogs. .
    (Good Example: Google Docs Blog)
  • If your CEO (or key employees) has something meaningful to say, providing good insights about the vision and motivation about the company, use blogs. .
    (Good example: Ryan Stewart, who works for Adobe as a Rich Internet Application Evangelist)
  • If you want to share your problems and happy moments while making a new product, use blogs..
    (Good example: Pocket God)
  • If you want to tell a story, use blogs.
    (Good example: Seth Godin)
  • If you want to share an idea (that requires more than 140 characters), use blogs.
  • If you want to advocate a cause, use blogs (backed by a facebook group)
  • If you want to share the excitement of something great you have made, use blogs
  • If you want to do interviews, and you cannot use video, use blogs.
  • If you want to publish articles, independently, use blogs. .
    (Good example: this site)
  • If you have a personal and in-depth message to share, use blogs..
    (Good example: Andy Budd)
  • If you want to publish news, do so in a personal way, with a personal touch, with blogs.

The blog is still the perfect place to connect with people via personal, focused, valuable and in-depth messages. But other social platforms have replaced the blog when it comes to other types of interactions.

The blog is dead when it comes to noise. The blog is dead when it comes to short messages. And, the blog is dead when it comes to sharing links.

But the blog is very much alive if you have something substantial to say.

This article recently posted on an American website about health information technology relates a pediatric GI’s relationship  (no pun intended) with social media like Twitter. He suggests there is a moral imperative for physicians to engage, if only to dispel the myths about medicine that permeate the internet. I agree but I sympathize with time/ROI conundrum he discusses. Physicians are really swamped and finding time to altruistically post information to the internet is a hard pill to swallow. Can industry help in some way? Could communications agencies help in some way? Could health associations like the CMA play a more active role in dispensing information?  The reality is that the most active exchange of information ever to happen on earth is happening now, and not to influence something as important as the accuarte flow of health information to patient populations and home care-givers (moms/fathers/sons & daughters) strikes me as tragic.

An HIT Moment with … is a quick interview with someone we find interesting. Bryan Vartabedian, MD FAAP is a physician and author of the 33 Charts blog.

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston. I first came to social media in 2006 when I started a blog in order to promote the book I was about to publish. I heard that, as an author, it is really helpful to have a dynamic changing presence on the Internet, like a blog. I started at that time thinking I was just going to use this as a tool to promote my book. I thought I couldn’t keep this up; that it would a few months and die off. But I never really stopped. It kind of evolved beyond just trying to sell a book. I recognized the reach that I had through expressing my opinions on a blog. And so it continued.

bryanvIt’s really just been over the last month or two that I have transitioned from a blog writing for parents to a blog writing more about issues of health and issues of health and how it intersects with social media. That is a fairly recent development for me even though it has been something I have been actively involved in and interested in. I came to Twitter last year with the same mindset. I said this is kind of interesting. I knew very few physicians on Twitter, said this sounds like fun and jumped into it. I really enjoyed the dialog that I had with other physicians and other patients, it gives me a real lens into what other people are thinking. I have about 1,200 followers currently and I am realizing there is real power to it. I did a post just last night on a new software platform called Hello Health, which is like a Facebook for physicians and allows patients and physicians to interact on a fee-for-service basis. I sent out a Twitter this morning on it and just had an enormous, enormous response. A viral retweeting. There’s no way I could have gotten the word out about that blog post without the assistance of Twitter.

What is your main focus – providing information or health news?

For about 2-1/2 years I was really writing as a pediatrician writing for parents. My audience was really consumer parents looking for information. I was covering timely health issues and parenting and children’s health, providing a unique voice and a real practical point of view for a lot of controversial issues. One thing I realized over time was with parents coming to the web they would come to my site with search engines they’d get information and they’d go away. I found this very unsatisfying because I wanted with my blog a real sense of community, and it’s really hard to develop community around children’s health issues, for whatever reason. Plus, I am a doctor, and it’s parents that are reading. But when I would write about doctor issues, as I am currently, I have a lot more comments and a lot more people who want to chime in and be part of the conversation. I like this idea of generating community around my blog, which was missing in my old way. I used to write health information for parents and now I am doing more commentary on medicine issues and how it intersects with social media.

As social media become a bigger part of healthcare, who stands to gain the most: the physicians or patients?

Interesting because one of the things that I am picking up on (and I am not the first) is that doctors are really late adopters of new technology and social media is a great example of that. There are really very few physicians on Twitter and there are very physicians who blog. If you look at pediatricians who blog, for example, if you scour the Internet you will only find a handful of regularly blogging pediatricians on a consistent basis. Physicians haven’t really taken advantage of using social media, either for themselves or more importantly, to advance health causes.

An example is the issue of vaccines and autism. You hear controversy about connecting vaccines with autism. If you Google it, the first two pages that come up are really occupied with anti-vaccine material. Yet the physicians write very, very little about it. Physicians really haven’t taken enough of a role to generate the content. There are 60,000 pediatricians in AAP, and if each member made one blog post a year on the vaccine controversy, it would dispel all those myths. We’d dominate the search engine with content that is valid.

I really think physicians have an ethical obligation to be part of the blog responses and comments. I don’t think physicians have really taken advantage of it for their businesses or practices or for the promotion or propagation of good health information. I see myself playing a role in trying to explore this space to see how we can use it to our advantage.

Obviously social media use is about helping patients – that’s the obvious sale. And patients are interacting with one another. With Web 1.0 we were really just reading information online, just like you would read a newspaper. But with Web 2.0 we are really establishing communities and communicating amongst ourselves. I have seen this in the office. It has been a huge boon with patients with rare diseases or parents with kids with rare diseases. They have communities and networks where they can share information, and that is really the power there.

Do you think social media are a fad or do you believe it they will eventually become mainstream in their use and acceptance?

I hear that sometimes, that social media is a fad. You often hear it from traditional publicists and traditional public affairs officers who think this is just a passing thing. The idea of people communicating with one another and networking is not a new thing. It’s really just new technology for doing something we have been doing for tens of thousands of year. I don’t think it is going away. The question I always ask is: “How are doctors going to use this? In five years from now, how are doctors going to be using social media?” I can’t answer that question, I don’t know. But I don’t think it is a fad.

How do you get more doctors onto the bandwagon?

There has to be an incentive for doctors to be involved in social media. It’s like adoption of any new technology. There has to be an incentive or a value proposition for them. Someone made a great comment on one of my posts last week about this. Doctors are very, very busy. Until you can demonstrate that being present on Twitter or having a regular blog or being present on the Internet in a social way, until you can prove that has real benefit, a real return on investment, it’s going to be very, very hard to draw physicians into this. It’s happening very slowly. But there has to be an incentive for them. To me it is a no-brainer. My visibility online has yielded all kinds of benefits. But it’s very hard, and we argue about this, how we will get doctors involved in social media.

My specialty is healthcare marketing.  I truly love this niche in the greater world of marketing, but there are times that I am frustrated by the lack of marketing experience in our category.  I was lucky, having spent my first 10 years in the consumer advertising business, learning the basics of my craft at advertising giants like Saatchi & Saatchi and DDB Needham.  So while I can’t teach everything that I learned over 10 years in consumer agencies to my pharma friends, I can help speed the learning curve a bit by providing some great reading tips.

If I were a DM, especially DM at a Pharma company, I would invest in my PM team by buying each of them these 12 books.  I would then ask that one book be read each month.  Then I would buy lunch and have it shipped into a conference room at the office, so that the group could discuss how the book influenced their thinking about their brand(s).  I think that the marketing group would be a pretty dynamic group by the end of the year.

1.  Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell.

Changed some of my ideas about success and even my approach to educating my kids. Malcolm Gladwell is a hero to me and one of the few people I would gladly pay to see and hear talk about…well pretty much whatever he might want to talk about.  Meticulous research, brilliant writing and a surprisingly good audio-book narrator.

2.  The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell.

Great book about how the influence of a few effects the popularity of many products and services.  The idea of this book is that the most important target audience is the group that influences popular opinion.  This was the first thing I read by Malcolm Gladwell.  I think I read it over a weekend at the beach…and yes I actually enjoyed reading a business book on the beach; that’s how good it is.

If you enjoy this one you should also read Blink.

3.  Ogilvy on Advertising. David Ogilvy.

Anyone who works in marketing should read this timeless work about the life and times of David Ogilvy, founder of Ogilvy & Mather.  Confessions of an Ad man is also a great read…especially if you enjoyed Ogilvy on Advertising.  I read this book when I was 20.  It helped me make my decision to get into advertising.

3.  The 22 Immutable Laws of Advertising.  Al Ries, Jack Trout.

This is one of those books it pays to dust off and read at least once a year.  I have trouble remembering the 10 commandments so 22 immutable laws is pretty much beyond the capacity of my aging memory.

4.  Why Johnny Can’t Brand.  Bill Schley and Carl Nichols Jr.

Before I read this book, I had some very specific ideas about branding and how it happens and why it’s important.  Reading this book cemented my ideas and made me better at explaining branding to my friends and customers.  This is an absolute must-read with a rocket, especially for my pharma friends.  You will understand, finally, how to respond to the sals rep who says, ” I can’t use my marketing tools with some of my docs.”  If you want me to explain personally, call me at 1-514-938-8626.  I will explain and save you reading the first two chapters of the book.

5. Selling The Invisible.  Harry Beckwith.  This may be the best book I’ve read on marketing services.  It’s full of wonderful examples and makes a great read.  There is a seal on the cover that reads:  The one book on marketingI’d have if I could have just one.”  A CLASSIC.  I agree completely with the sentiment.

6.  The Borderless World.  Kenichi Omae

I won’t kid you.  This is a tough read.  But I think it’s better than the best-selling book by Thomas Friedman – The World is Flat.  Take your time and read this after you’ve absorbed some of the easier reads on this list.

7.  Kotler on Marketing.  Philip Kotler.

See above.  This is text-book stuff, but that said, if you never went to marketing school, and you just got a job in marketing (hello pharma sales rep turned product manager), pick this one up and use it as a reference guide.

8.  The Art of the Start.  Guy Kawasaki.

This is one of those books that inspires.  I personally think that truly great marketers are entrepreneurs at heart.  Read The Art of the Start because it inspires and is a great window into the heart and soul of entrepreneurial spirit.

9.  Rules for Revolutionaries.  Guy Kawasaki.

Create Like a God.  Command Like a King.  Work Like a Slave.  Kawasaki illustrates his ideas with the support of some great stories and analogies.  I think of him as THE MARKETING EVANGELICAL OF OUR TIME, far more-so than “The Apple Guy”.  I said it first Guy…maybe the title of a future book?  BTW.  If you don’t read the book, buy it anyway and read everything in the bibliography.  Now that’s a must-read list.

10.  What They Don’t Teach You at Harvard Business School.  Mark McCormack.

Just a great read created by a very savvy entrepreneur.  McCormack basically invented the concept of the sports agent.  His company IMG, before he sold it, managed a who’s who of sports stars.  Here is the chapter list for those who think they can’t learn anything about marketing from a “sports marketing guru.”:  Reading people, Creating Impressions, Taking the Edge, Getting Ahead, The Problems of selling, Timing, Silence, Marketability, Strategems, Negotiating, Building a Business, Staying in Business, Getting Things Done, For Entrepreneurs Only.

11.  The Exceptional Presenter.  Tomothy Koegel.

I thought I was a great presenter.  People have told me I am a great presenter.  I read this book and realized, I have a lot to learn about presenting before I am even close to being a great presenter.  I have watched so many bad presentations over the years, that I beg you…I repeat… I beg you to please read this book.

12.  Managing Brand Equity.  David Aakers.

We expect few new blockbuster drugs to be launched in the next few years, if any, so I think the last book on this list should be about how to get the most out of what you’ve already got.  This is the bible on brand equity and how to build & preserve it.  I read this back in ‘91 or ‘92 and I think it holds up well.  Aakers is a marketing god, so read anything he wrote and you’ll be better for it.  I plan on reading Strategic Market Management soon, and he wrote another I might grab called Building Strong Brands.

This is by no means even close to being a “best-of list” or a “top 12″.  It’s simply a list of books about business, marketing and life, that I think matter enough that I would recommend them to anyone as worth having in your library.

If you have read some books that you think I might like enjoy or learn from, (hopefully both), please email me at binding@commcomm.ca.  Thanks in advance and good reading!

Remember that in my first post I said that the BLOG would encompass Pharma marketing, branding, ideas and inspiration.  Well this falls into the inspiration column.  I am a huge Tim Burton fan.  So the news below has got me pretty excited.  It comes out in March, 2010 so all I can say is…please God can we somehow bypass Halloween, Thankgsgiving, Christmas and New Year’s so that March can be here tomorrow.  LOL.  I cannot wait!!!

Tim Burton’s Beautiful Reboot of Alice in Wonderland

BY CLIFF KUANG18 minutes ago

Unveiling the first production stills of the fantasy master’s next movie.


AliceJPEG

For several years, Tim Burton’s been working on his next movie, a remake of Alice in Wonderland that’s set for release six months from now, in March 2010. USA Today got anexclusive first look at the production stills, and as you can see, they’re utterly gorgeous–a full departure from the signature look that Burton leaned on in A Nightmare Before Christmas and Coraline.

Currently, the movie is in post production, where the live action sequences are been merged with motion-capture creatures. Eventually, the entire movie will be converted into 3-D. Above, you see Johnny Depp (looking like a dead ringer for Elijah Wood) as The Mad Hatter, Helena Bonham Carter as The Red Queen, and Anne Hathaway as The White Queen.

And here’s a scene were Alice, played by Mia Wasikowska (from the HBO series In Treatment) walks through a garden of talking rose blossoms, at the entrance of a forrest filled with giant mushrooms:

aliceinwonderland-JuneFL-conceptfull01

And here’s the first meeting between Alice and the White Rabbit, played by Michael Sheen:

aliceinwonderland-JuneFL-conceptfull02

The movie is actually less of a remake and more of a sequel. As USA Today writes:

Alice, 17, attends a party at a Victorian estate only to find she is about to be proposed to in front of hundreds of snooty society types. Off she runs, following a white rabbit into a hole and ending up in Wonderland, a place she visited 10 years before yet doesn’t remember.

Among those who welcome her back is the Mad Hatter, a part tailor-made for Johnny Depp as he collaborates with Burton for the seventh time. “This character is off his rocker,” Zanuck says.

Can’t wait.

top